| Faculty Percentage | Academic Areas | License Income | Fulbright Awds-07 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution | Not in TenureSystem | Diversity '05 '07b | Top Ten | $M '06 '08 | Awards /Appln | ||||||
| Arizona | 37.0% | 14 16 | 24 | 3 1 | 11/45 | ||||||
| Illinois | 40.9% | 17 16 | 21 | 10 7 | 6/40 | ||||||
| UCLA | 26.4% | 29 30 | 41 | N/A | 12/38 | ||||||
| Michigan | 46.1% | 20 18 | 44 | 20 25 | 37/119 | ||||||
| Minnesota | 17.5% | 15 13 | 26 | 56 85 | 7/35 | ||||||
| OSU | 22.9% | 15 15 | 22 | 1 2 | 11/34 | ||||||
| Penn State | 47.8% | 13 12 | 29 | 1 2 | 9/47 | ||||||
| Texas | 32.0% | 10 11 | 28 | 8 12 | 11/45 | ||||||
| Washington | 43.5% | 14 17 | 42 | 36 54 | 8/32 | ||||||
| Wisconsin | 38.6% | 15 14 | 54 | 42 54 | 18/65 | ||||||
| Data Src | [a] | [b] | [c] | [d] [e] | [f] | ||||||
[a] AAUP Contingent Faculty Index. These percentage are believed to be lower estimates that the AAUP expects to rise as better data becomes available; see Appendix 1. Story in CHE 15 December 2006, pp.A7-8.
[b] 2005: CHE 28 September 2007, B17-31. "The percentage is calculated as
follows: The sum of American Indian, Asian, black, and Hispanic faculty
members divided by the total minus the amount categorized as race
unknown."
2007: CHE 16 October 2009, B42-54. Same rule for
calculated percentage.
[c] CHE 16 November 2007; A10. Ranking of areas are based on faculty productivity by weighting publications (journal articles & books), citations, grants, awards & honors; see http://chronicle.com/stats/productivity/ for explanation.
[d] Assoc. University Technology Managers, US Licensing Activity Survey: FY2006 N.B. Only total for U. Cal. system:$193.5 M.
[e] Assoc. University Technology Managers Data on ppA26-7 CHE February 26, 2010
[f] Fulbright Research Institutioions Receiving Awards 2007-2008,