Referee Report of Long Policy Paper

Author:

Reviewer:

  1. Topic sentences. Underline the topic sentences in the text. Comments.
  2. Abstract and conclusion. How does the
    1. abstract specifically identify the main points and physics of the paper?
    2. conclusion aptly summarize the main points and physics of the paper?
  3. Illustrations. Are the illustrations appropriate and clear?
  4. Accuracy and fairness. How well does the author argue the case? How well does the author admit and deal with serious objections to this case?
  5. Structure.* How does the structure of the paper enhance its clarity? [Note: Structure includes (i) division of paper into major, identifiable sections, (ii) their development into paragraphs, and (iii) cumulative progress to establish main conclusion.]

Return the paper with this report.


Your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
[Previous] [Writing Course Home Page]

To cite this page:
Referee Report of Long Policy Paper
<http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu>
[]

Edited by: wilkins@mps.ohio-state.edu on