Almost all the main pts are on vgs, but they're all in point form, little bit of sentences would help.
No main points on vgs [three times].
Vgs were very good, easy to follow;
and main pts on vgs, good amount of info
and vgs generally well done, info on them was the right amount;
but too much info on vgs;
however math sheet was full [three times].
Dark background with light lettering hard to read
and vgs not clear visually
and vgs unreadable
and some poor resolution [of vgs]
and figures impossible to read due to their poor quality but speaker
explained points they were supposed to illustrate
but main pts were on vgs, quite easy to follow the talk, figures
Many comments that letters were too small to read.
and logical presentation
and points seemed to flow [twice]
but development jumped around some.
Organization was ok [twice]
and pretty logical organization
and I'm sure he was organized ...
finally organization was lacking
and I did not understand what [topic] was until half the talk was finished.
Jumped right into the topic
and intro was not very specific
and I seemed to have missed intro and conclusion
and Still no intro
and ... not as clear an intro as possible
but speaker had a clear intro to topic, developed ideas in logical manner.
Followed a precise format and did not waver
and ideas seemed well laid out
and organization was logical
and development was good
and had good organization of idea
and good intro of ideas, those ideas were indeed
developed, and good wrapup of those ideas
but didn't understand a lot of it.
Very logical flow of topics
and development of ideas was wonderful
and structure and logical flow is fine
and ideas were well organized and [flowed] smoothly into each other
but didn't really see point of talk until third vg.
Captured interest [7 times]
but if you hadn't had the course not clear what the point was.
Was very interested in topic
and made subject interesting [twice]
and interesting but I didn't understand where he was going
but Not especially enlightening but easy to understand
and did not capture interest, yes, was lost [twice]
and Not especially enlightening but easy to understand.
Interesting topic but he did speak choppy
and interesting topic but section on ... was unclear
and interesting topic but he didn't develop his ... terms as well as I hoped
and captured interest but was just a little lost on what ... were,
finally did not capture my interest, got lost with too
many details and speaker jumped from one topic to another.
Speaker did not seem comfortable with topic
and nervousness impeded talk
and He stood in front of the projector, so I could not see it at all.
Interest in material communicated
and Good energy, excellent volume and enunciation; moved around which was great.
Good physical presentation
but very stagnate, not much movement.
Talked seemed rushed
and spoke quickly [three times]
but speak more slowly [twice].
An entertaining speaker, managed to hold audience attention even though most of us would not willingly attend a talk on this topic.