Lecture XVII

Physics 367

Energy Storage and Energy Alternatives



Why energy storage?

Rise of utilities was an outgrowth of the difficulty of storing electrical energy.

What do we mean by this?

Utilities have problems with peak load...

What are the consequences?
What are the alternatives?
Can anything really be done?


Pumped Storage balances supply and demand by moving water between reservoirs (70% efficient for water)

construct a reservoir above a source of H2O.
in times of slack demand, use electricity to pump water to the reservoir.
when you need electricity, run water through turbines to generate it.
can be used to increase base load, decrease peak load....is this good?
base costs to pump water ~$0.03-0.05/kWh.

Pumped water storage is used in:

Michigan (2000 MWe plant in Ludington)
Pennsylvania (870 MWe).

Can also do this for air at about 90% efficiency. In 2000 the US had about 20GW of pumped storage capability.


Load Management

In load management the utility starts and stops home electrical storage water heaters by radio or timer. This uses the consumers own consumption of electricity to flatten out the load curve. These include:

-pressurized hot water tanks
-floor slab units


Superconductors

What is a superconductor?

Materials in which the electrical resistance disappears at some critical temperature (Mercury Tc = 4.2K; Niobium-Tin Tc = 23K).

Why superconductors?

Joule losses (I2R)! True workable room temperature superconductors would revolutionize technology.

Effciency of electric generators
-Conventional electric generators are 98.6% eff.
-Superconducting generators will be ~99.5% eff.

Is this gain worth it?

-Not for refrigerators, etc.
-Room-temperature superconducting transmission lines would save
10-15% for short-distance transmission
2% for long-distance transmission.

What does this mean?

-1% improvement in transmission $1 billion in savings.


Type II superconductors

Do not lose their superconducting properties in a magnetic field.
These are used for making large magnets...which could be used to store energy since currents would circulate with no loss.
This technology is developing rapidly and such devices will probably exist in your lifetime!
Other uses: computers, magnetic trains.


Flywheels

Flywheels are an old technology. Storing energy in a slow moving heavy object has been around for a long time.

Example: The car engine
The car engine stores energy in a flywheel between cylinder strokes...the cars flywheel is connected directly to the camshaft and continues to turn even if the cylinder has stopped. The rotational energy causes compression of the gas in the next cylinder in sequence.

So what is new about flywheels?....

It is the material....strong plastics and epoxy allow edge speed of 1400 m/s!

It is now feasible to create cars which store energy in flywheels ...these could be powered by electricity, natural gas, etc.

The presently available flywheels for cars rotate at 30,000 rpm and can deliver 0.55 kWhe. These may be considered flywheel batteries. The Prius uses flywheels to store energy!


Batteries

The oldest electrical storage device is the battery. The lead-acid battery in your car is capable of producing 50-100W/kg for a total stored energy of 25-35 Wh/kg.

However lead is expensive. Other alternatives include:

- sodium-sulfur battery (100 kWh - GE)
- zinc-chloride prototype (50 Wh - Gulf)
- lithium-aluminum (100 Wh/kg - ANL)
- lithium-water (55 Wh/kg - Canada)

But cars need fast recharge:

- metal hydride allows 350 km/recharge with 20 min recharge.


Phase Changes

Recall: latent heat of fusion of water=333kJ/kg at 0°C. In sodium sulfate it is 213 kJ/kg at 31°C. The idea here is to store excess energy in the material by changing its phase (solid to liquid) and then get it back later by using the liquid to run a generator.

See Energy for energy storage screening curves.


Proven Energy Alternatives    Survey of Energy Resources 2001

Time proven: peat, wood, biomass, geothermal
Coming: solar, wind, municipal solid waste (MSW)
Out there: oil shale, tidal/wave, ocean thermal, marine current energy
Perhaps but when: fusion


Geothermal Energy

The natural heat flow at the Earth’s surface is 3.5x104 kWh/s with a range of 30-500 mW/m2. Thus a total energy of 230 TkWh is stored in the Earth to a depth of 3 km. There are quite a few geothermal plants:

Geysers, CA - 2000 MWe
Cerro Prieto, Mexico - 645 MWe
Broadlands, New Zealand - 145 MWe

The energy is stored in

water   (in US 10%)
methane  (in US 20%)
dry rock  (in US 70%)
magma  (in US 1%)


Burning Garbage

Why should we burn garbage?

70-80% of Municipal waste is combustible.
Unprocessed solid waste can produce 10-15 MJ/kg compared to 23 MJ/kg coal.
Garbage produces methane at a rate of 250 m3/tonne.
NYC alone sends 20,000 tonnes of garbage into landfills each day.
Incinerators can reduce the volume by about a factor of 2-4.

A typical plant uses 10% coal with the garbage.

What happens when there are no landfills?

See Energy for a description of the Columbus trash burning facility and its fate....in particular:

plastics if not burned completely at high enough temperature, (>1000°C), produce dioxin....
if the temperature is too high they produce nitrogen oxides.


Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

Hydrogen can be

burned efficiently and
transported cheaper than electricity.

Need metal hydrides which "soak up" hydrogen at 20 times atmospheric pressure and release it at 5 times atmospheric pressure. These also "clean" the hydrogen.

Hydrogen can also be used in fuel cells and run electric cars.


Problem of the day (food for thought)

When a pesticide is applied to cropland, the target pest population sometimes increases while the predator population that has been controlling the pest declines. How do we understand this?

If the pesticide attacks the pest population and reduces it, the predator population might be reduced. That in turn would relieve the pressure on the pest population allowing it to grow back. But then wouldn’t the predator population recover as well?

No if the pesticide attacks the predator
No if the predator eats the contaminated prey

How would we model this?

Note that if the pesticide attacks the prey then a’ will decrease which will reduce the predator population...not the ultimate prey population!

Note also if the pesticide also increases the death rate of the predator then a’ will decrease and a will increase...the effect of this is to decrease the steady state predator population and increase the steady state prey population!

The equations which describe this model are: